46K views 29 minutes ago
MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on recent court filings by Special Counsel Jack Smith and brilliant legal strategies to have the federal criminal cases against Donald Trump heard before the November 2024 election.
Remember when Judge Cannon turned on Trump you mental midget ?
Better luck with this MAJOR MOVE this time around .
Jack Smith requests Trump classified document trial date pushed to December
Judge Cannon sets May 20 date for documents case
Wtf does this Washington case have to do with "Loose" Cannon, you fat, blubbery, disgusting, funky welching Scumbag? You have the attention span of a fly, Fat Boy. Do yourself a favor and read how Smith outsmarted that corrupt twat into that trial move, so that it'll be sucking hind tit to multiple OTHER cases, lol. Meanwhile, enjoy those SEVENTY-EIGHT FELONY CHARGES, JAGOFF:There’s a Judge Cannon bump out there for you on a previous JacKMeOff requested trail date . Oh , and eat a dick maggot .
.
How Jack Smith's three-dimensional chess moves outwitted Trump's legal strategy...
by vjr7121
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Wednesday, August 02, 2023 at 12:01:30p PDT
244
Comments
244 NEW
Recommend Story596
GAME ON
Many have likened the current legal battle between the DOJ and Donald Trump’s legal teams as a chess match— replete with pawns, castles, knights, and a wannabee king. With the new indictment issued this week, the DOJ case against former president Donald Trump will mark a watershed moment in our history. No matter how the trial ends, it will rival the most consequential court cases argued before an American judge and jury. It may, in fact, rise to the level of those important cases argued before the Supreme Court, that is unless a Trump appeal is brought before the highest court’s nine Justices and their decision stands as a landmark ruling rivaling the most influential decided by the Court.In the current matter, of particular interest to historians may well be Jack Smith’s trial strategy and what appears to have been an ingenious maneuvering of the Florida court in his earlier indictment of Trump and an associate in the documents case and how Smith played that court and the Trump legal team to his advantage.
While everyone focused on the appointment of Judge Cannon to hear the documents case, and her past record of bending her decisions regarding the former president in his favor, some questioned Smith’s decision to file the indictment in Florida where an unsympathetic judge and jury awaited:
- Would Cannon throw out the Federal indictment?
- Could she delay the trial beyond the election enabling Trump to run, win and pardon himself and his cronies?
- Would she hear the case and impose a sentence that would be a slap on the wrist in an example of judicial nullification?
- Would a St. Lucie County jury with the support of a sympathetic judge nullify the prosecution’s case?
FLORIDA’S LEGAL SWAMP
Judge Cannon took the bait. She pushed the opening of the trial to May with the opportunity for Trump’s defense team to force further delays effectively putting off the case until after the election. This would allow Trump to run for president as a defendant in a blue suit rather than an orange jumpsuit. Again, some would argue, Cannon found a way to accede to the defense counsel’s request to put the trial off to Trump’s benefit. All he would need to escape all charges was to win the election with a scorched earth campaign and pardon himself.Smith’s next move made that possibility even more likely as he added a superseding indictment that would give Trump’s lawyers more reasons to argue for delays— allowing Cannon more cover to grant the delays.
The 45-page indictment handed down this week in Washington minimizes that prospect by ensuring that the most important of the trials facing Trump will occur within the window established by the Florida court and will likely be heard and decided before the American voters head to the polls in November of 2024. Judge Aileen Cannon’s power to determine who sits in the White House has been minimized and her trial will be made to appear anticlimactic to the D.C. case that will have been heard in Washington, D.C. This doesn’t make certain Trump will be convicted, a jury of 12 citizens have that responsibility, but it does give Smith’s prosecution team a fair hearing of the issues and will reduce the opportunity for the Florida court case to be determinative. It will also negate any advantage for the Trump defense to further delay hearing Smith’s rock-solid case for obstruction because, at that point, the case of the documents would represent at best a “hail Mary” for Trump to get a court victory before the election if, in fact, the D.C. case convicts Trump. Given the options, the latest indictment gives the government the better chance at victory and sealing the fate of Donald Trump.
Technically, the D.C. case is more complex, and its four charges represent crimes at the heart of the case against Trump’s bid for another presidential term. To his credit, Smith has streamlined his case to focus on one defendant. The indictment hints at a vast amount of indisputable evidence given in some cases by Trump’s own behavior and by the testimony of his close associates. The obstruction charge alone could assure a convicted defendant of a sentence of more than a decade. While the Mar-a-Lago documents case has a strong obstruction charge and conspiracy elements that should prove compelling to a jury, the vagaries of the venue make it a risk for prosecutors, especially if the judge is overly sympathetic to the defendant who appointed her.
THE UNICORN DEFENSE
Smith’s tactics relied on Cannon’s inexperience. When the documents trial calendar was being proposed, it was clear that the defense wanted to put it off until after the election:They argued that the uniqueness of this case, a Federal indictment against a former president and a current presidential candidate, was beyond the court’s ability to adjudicate the issues. Their brief included an appeal to a friendly judge to outright dismiss the case based upon a specious argument that would establish a precedent making the former president immune from any prosecution:
Their filing attempts to immunize their client as a legal unicorn, a defendant who stands outside the law simply because of the audacity of his transgressions and his former status as president.
ENDGAME
The new indictment makes this argument moot. In setting a May trial date, Cannon was proving herself to be too clever by half. An early spring date would have been more appropriate given the facts. The government had fast-tracked the Discovery process and the case itself was fairly simple— remember, the trial date was set before the superseding indictments. The conspiracy case against Trump and Waltine Nauta was not especially complicated given the facts cited in the indictment. By moving the trial to May, closer to the 2024 election, the defense would be expected to enlist legal maneuverings to further delay the start until their argument for a post-election trial became more likely. Check.This week the man who Trump labels as deranged and has called a “sick puppet” has proved himself a worthy adversary to his slow-footed opposition. The window opened up by Cannon and requested by Trump lawyers, may just be wide enough to allow for a scenario in which their client is bogged down in Federal Court in the Nation’s Capital; in Georgia State Court in Atlanta; and courts in New York— all far more favorable venues for prosecutors of the former president. In addition, the second E. Jean Carroll civil trial is scheduled in January. By that time Judge Cannon’s court becomes an afterthought, Donald Trump begins his appeals, and America may begin to wake up from our long national nightmare.
Mate.
Wtf does this Washington case have to do with "Loose" Cannon, you fat, blubbery, disgusting, funky welching Scumbag? You have the attention span of a fly, Fat Boy. Do yourself a favor and read how Smith outsmarted that corrupt twat into that trial move, so that it'll be sucking hind tit to multiple OTHER cases, lol. Meanwhile, enjoy those SEVENTY-EIGHT FELONY CHARGES, JAGOFF:
How Jack Smith's three-dimensional chess moves outwitted Trump's legal strategy...
by vjr7121
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Wednesday, August 02, 2023 at 12:01:30p PDT
244
Comments
244 NEW
Recommend Story596
GAME ON
Many have likened the current legal battle between the DOJ and Donald Trump’s legal teams as a chess match— replete with pawns, castles, knights, and a wannabee king. With the new indictment issued this week, the DOJ case against former president Donald Trump will mark a watershed moment in our history. No matter how the trial ends, it will rival the most consequential court cases argued before an American judge and jury. It may, in fact, rise to the level of those important cases argued before the Supreme Court, that is unless a Trump appeal is brought before the highest court’s nine Justices and their decision stands as a landmark ruling rivaling the most influential decided by the Court.
In the current matter, of particular interest to historians may well be Jack Smith’s trial strategy and what appears to have been an ingenious maneuvering of the Florida court in his earlier indictment of Trump and an associate in the documents case and how Smith played that court and the Trump legal team to his advantage.
While everyone focused on the appointment of Judge Cannon to hear the documents case, and her past record of bending her decisions regarding the former president in his favor, some questioned Smith’s decision to file the indictment in Florida where an unsympathetic judge and jury awaited:
The nation’s attention was fixed on the inexperienced judge who had shown great deference in the past to her patron. Cannon’s prior decisions in the preliminary motions in the case were reversed by a three-judge Federal appeals panel in a rebuke that called into question her judicial competence:
- Would Cannon throw out the Federal indictment?
- Could she delay the trial beyond the election enabling Trump to run, win and pardon himself and his cronies?
- Would she hear the case and impose a sentence that would be a slap on the wrist in an example of judicial nullification?
- Would a St. Lucie County jury with the support of a sympathetic judge nullify the prosecution’s case?
FLORIDA’S LEGAL SWAMP
Judge Cannon took the bait. She pushed the opening of the trial to May with the opportunity for Trump’s defense team to force further delays effectively putting off the case until after the election. This would allow Trump to run for president as a defendant in a blue suit rather than an orange jumpsuit. Again, some would argue, Cannon found a way to accede to the defense counsel’s request to put the trial off to Trump’s benefit. All he would need to escape all charges was to win the election with a scorched earth campaign and pardon himself.
Smith’s next move made that possibility even more likely as he added a superseding indictment that would give Trump’s lawyers more reasons to argue for delays— allowing Cannon more cover to grant the delays.
The 45-page indictment handed down this week in Washington minimizes that prospect by ensuring that the most important of the trials facing Trump will occur within the window established by the Florida court and will likely be heard and decided before the American voters head to the polls in November of 2024. Judge Aileen Cannon’s power to determine who sits in the White House has been minimized and her trial will be made to appear anticlimactic to the D.C. case that will have been heard in Washington, D.C. This doesn’t make certain Trump will be convicted, a jury of 12 citizens have that responsibility, but it does give Smith’s prosecution team a fair hearing of the issues and will reduce the opportunity for the Florida court case to be determinative. It will also negate any advantage for the Trump defense to further delay hearing Smith’s rock-solid case for obstruction because, at that point, the case of the documents would represent at best a “hail Mary” for Trump to get a court victory before the election if, in fact, the D.C. case convicts Trump. Given the options, the latest indictment gives the government the better chance at victory and sealing the fate of Donald Trump.
Technically, the D.C. case is more complex, and its four charges represent crimes at the heart of the case against Trump’s bid for another presidential term. To his credit, Smith has streamlined his case to focus on one defendant. The indictment hints at a vast amount of indisputable evidence given in some cases by Trump’s own behavior and by the testimony of his close associates. The obstruction charge alone could assure a convicted defendant of a sentence of more than a decade. While the Mar-a-Lago documents case has a strong obstruction charge and conspiracy elements that should prove compelling to a jury, the vagaries of the venue make it a risk for prosecutors, especially if the judge is overly sympathetic to the defendant who appointed her.
THE UNICORN DEFENSE
Smith’s tactics relied on Cannon’s inexperience. When the documents trial calendar was being proposed, it was clear that the defense wanted to put it off until after the election:
They argued that the uniqueness of this case, a Federal indictment against a former president and a current presidential candidate, was beyond the court’s ability to adjudicate the issues. Their brief included an appeal to a friendly judge to outright dismiss the case based upon a specious argument that would establish a precedent making the former president immune from any prosecution:
Their filing attempts to immunize their client as a legal unicorn, a defendant who stands outside the law simply because of the audacity of his transgressions and his former status as president.
ENDGAME
The new indictment makes this argument moot. In setting a May trial date, Cannon was proving herself to be too clever by half. An early spring date would have been more appropriate given the facts. The government had fast-tracked the Discovery process and the case itself was fairly simple— remember, the trial date was set before the superseding indictments. The conspiracy case against Trump and Waltine Nauta was not especially complicated given the facts cited in the indictment. By moving the trial to May, closer to the 2024 election, the defense would be expected to enlist legal maneuverings to further delay the start until their argument for a post-election trial became more likely. Check.
This week the man who Trump labels as deranged and has called a “sick puppet” has proved himself a worthy adversary to his slow-footed opposition. The window opened up by Cannon and requested by Trump lawyers, may just be wide enough to allow for a scenario in which their client is bogged down in Federal Court in the Nation’s Capital; in Georgia State Court in Atlanta; and courts in New York— all far more favorable venues for prosecutors of the former president. In addition, the second E. Jean Carroll civil trial is scheduled in January. By that time Judge Cannon’s court becomes an afterthought, Donald Trump begins his appeals, and America may begin to wake up from our long national nightmare.
Mate.
View attachment 73697
JackMeOff is 0-1 on his requested trial dates shit for brains . That’s what the Cannon case has to do with it . Another abandoned thread you started thinking she was turning on Trump BTW .
Better luck with a speedy trial in this dog shit case in the cesspool of DC where the amount of discovery will be huge and take months to go through
Lol !
